Total Pageviews

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Brave (Release Date: 6-22-2012)


          Once upon a time, there was a film studio named Pixar, and they could do no wrong. Beginning with their inaugural offering, 1996’s Toy Story, the folks over at the Disney subsidiary produced one champion after another, each flick more heavily anticipated than the last. The studio married quality and commerce in a way that no other movie house has touched in at least the last decade, using originality, humor, and heart to pump out one money-guzzling, insta-classic after another. Sadly, there’s a reason that I’m writing all of this in passed tense: The following review is something of an obituary for the greatest film-making fraternity of my adult life.

        Much has been made of Pixar finally turning to a female protagonist, but the path that our carrot-topped hero trots down is more than a bit familiar. Merida (Kelly McDonald) is not only a Scottish Princess, but also trouble-making free spirit. When her mother (Emma Thompson) decides that it’s time for her daughter to marry, Merida takes actions into her own hands, first embarrassing her suitors, then becoming mixed up with scorcery that quickly spirals out of control. If this description of a young, wily female struggling against both her mother and the cultural concerns that she represents sounds familiar, wait till you see the rest.

        The, ‘Pixar Touch,’ is woefully lacking here, just about every aspect of the production starved for their normative ingenuity. Switching up the protagonist’s gender doesn’t really do anything when you’re essentially importing her from Tangled, Princess and the Frog, Aladdin, and any other princess cartoon you can recall. Her concerns are so commonplace, so unclouded by either complication or nuance (and, in some areas, even basic intelligence), that advertising this as a progressive move from the animators is just plain insulting. Fine, you added a lady to your collection; why did you add her?

        And since when have Luxo Jr. and friends become so eager to outsource? Brave is directed by Mark Edwards and Brenda Chapman, only the second and third directors to be added to the Pixar stable since Brad Bird debuted with 2004’s The Incredibles (Toy Story 3’s Lee Ulrich is the other newbie). Their freshness (See: Inexperience) shows in nearly every frame, neglecting to gloss over their messier passages, instead letting their lack of attention to detail permeate the whole production. Perhaps even more disheartening, the standard Pixar Short that takes place in front of Brave isn’t even an in-house production: It’s last year’s Best Animated Short Nominee, La Luna, which is built in the likeness of a Pixar short, but looks and behaves nothing like one.

        Look, I know I’m being hard, and Brave certainly isn’t the horrid kiddie fare that a lot of studios dump out mindlessly. It’s positively stunning to look at, the vast plains, textured animals, and, yes, that unruly maine of red hair, all causing jaws to drop. But this is a group of people who set an impossibly high bar for themselves, one that Brave comes no where close to clearing. In 2010, we were surprised to see Dreamworks finally give Pixar a run for their money with the wonderful How to Train Your Dragon. Last year, we lamented that Cars 2 seemed more like a cash-grab than a heartfelt artistic endeavor. And now this. I’m not ready to call them dead just yet, but consider this: once their next offering, Monsters University, is released, it will represent three sequels in their last four entries, with their one original movie wholly failing to live up to its billing. Brave is the most ironically named movie of 2012, a chicken, a dud, and the surest, saddest sign yet that these guys might have finally lost it.

Grade: D+

9 comments:

  1. I feel like you're being a lot harder on this than you should be. Probably because it's a Pixar film. If Sony or Dreamworks had released it, would your review have been more glowing (since this is better than all but one or two of their films)? If I remember correctly, you gave Cars 2 a B or even a B+. Did you really think that was the better film?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tyler, Collin and I absolutely talked about this, and yes, it would've been a better movie by the likes of Dreamworks. But we know they can and they have done a lot better than this, especially movies regarding non-sequels. This is their first stand-alone movie they have produced since Up, and it's mediocrity makes you question what they did with all that time. Just sayin'.

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's a fair judgement, and of course everyone is entitled to their opinion, but I really loved Brave!

    ReplyDelete
  4. What did you like about Brave? It was visually dazzling, but that's all I can give it. Lame humor, forgettable characters, terrible cut-away song montages, and the same exact plot as every mommy/daddy issues kid's flick of the last lifetime. Really, Pixar, you're going to have a whole plot based on Merida using loose wording (I want to change my mom)? Really, Pixar? The more days go by, the worse I feel about it. Brave was impossible for me to care about, and the whole plot seemed cooked up over night to support their visual ideas... YUCK!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I actually really loved the character of Merida and thought her father was even more fun. Obviously the visual aspect was pretty amazing and even though I had seen this plot played out a few times before, I felt that it was really well done. It's not my favorite Pixar, but it was certainly at least on par with Cars, if not slightly better (leagues better than Cars 2).

    ReplyDelete
  6. You're right about this; I wanted to love it while I was watching but it fell awfully flat. The one positive aspect of the female heroine, though, that no one else has done is that there was no love interest at all. Yes, Tangled, Princess and the Frog, etc. are all strong female leads, but they also always marry the prince as part of their happy ending. Brave's ending didn't need a man, and I really appreciated that.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Tyler: Honestly, I'd take Cars 2 ANY DAY. Sticking up for Brave's plot as being 'better,' than Cars 2 is, in my eyes, a silly argument, like asking who develops characters better between Michael Bay, and Roland Emmerich: they're both in the shitter in that department, so who cares? That being said, the action sequences in Cars 2 were DAZZLING, worth the price of admission in and of themselves. Soulless, yes, but so is Brave, and I'd rather watch soulless action than soulless meandering in search of a plot.

    Allison: I suppose I hadn't thought of it that way. No isle for Merida! I was too distracted by the fact that the story's central issue (Merida doesn't want to wed, but Mommy wants her to) was essentially dropped by the conclusion, with all of these men who have traveled so far just... understanding? Leaving in peace just after they were about to start a riot just because... it's been an hour and a half, and they need to clean the theater for the next showing? I mean, I guess she did give a speech...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Oh, and a short side-note: I just watched Wall-e last night. I know movies shouldn't be judged of the past successes of their studio, and comparing any flick to that one will result in a blood bath more often than not. Still, what an embarrassing downgrade in quality. I can't fathom that the two were made by the same extended group of people. Shameful.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I thought Brave was so profoundly annoying that I couldn't even finish watching it. I agree that it was beautifully animated, and I'm a little interested to find out that the princess wasn't married off in the end, but it was SO tedious to watch the same tired characters yet again, especially on the heels of Tangled, which I felt was very fresh and clever. Pixar DOES have a reputation to maintain, and I think that's ok. If they're getting tired of their deal with Disney, that's no one's fault but their own.

    ReplyDelete